|
PICurv 0.1.0
A Parallel Particle-In-Cell Solver for Curvilinear LES
|
PICurv runs are composed from modular inputs. This lets you swap physics, numerics, monitoring, and post-analysis independently.
A single-run workflow uses five logical inputs:
case.yml: physics/domain/grid/BC/run controlsolver.yml: numerical strategy and solver controlsmonitor.yml: logging, profiling, output cadence, directoriespost.yml: post-processing pipeline recipe-n)Cluster/sweep extensions add:
cluster.yml: Slurm resource/scheduler contract (run --cluster, sweep --cluster)study.yml: parameter matrix + metrics/plot contract (sweep --study)You can choose any file names. C binaries do not require fixed YAML names.
Example solve invocation:
Only numerics/monitoring can be swapped without touching case physics. In practice, users often keep one validated case.yml, then compare multiple solver.yml or monitor.yml profiles against it, or reuse one post.yml across several cases.
picurv validates inputs, then generates C-facing artifacts under runs/<run_id>/config/:
<run_id>.controlbcs.run or bcs_block*.runwhitelist.runprofile.runpost.runThese are the concrete contract consumed by C-side parsers in setup.c, io.c, and BC/profile loaders.
Project-level shared profiles live in:
Use these as reusable baselines and keep case-specific physics in study-local files.
Proceed to Configuration Reference: Case YAML.
For full contract and ingestion mapping, also see:
This page describes Anatomy of a Simulation within the PICurv workflow. For CFD users, the most reliable reading strategy is to map the page content to a concrete run decision: what is configured, what runtime stage it influences, and which diagnostics should confirm expected behavior.
Treat this page as both a conceptual reference and a runbook. If you are debugging, pair the method/procedure described here with monitor output, generated runtime artifacts under runs/<run_id>/config, and the associated solver/post logs so numerical intent and implementation behavior stay aligned.